One of the things I like about LiveJournal is that it makes a certain amount of social network data available and visible. Yes, the whole "friends list" concept is overloaded by being a reading list and/or an access-control list depending on the user, and different people have wildly different criteria for adding someone to the list, but it's still a lot of data, and fun to play with.
One of the fun tools people have developed to use this data is the Clique Finder, which finds the largest group (or groups) of users who have all other members of the group listed as friends containing a particular user. At the moment, I am a member of 7 cliques of size 9, but there are interesting overlaps between the seven.
Several of those lists make me look like a member of the
rasff gang, don't they?
Well, that format is nice and all, but a little analysis and reformatting gets us this:
This makes some patterns more obvious.
akirlu,
brisingamen, and
supergee form a sort of super-clique, appearing in all seven variations. There are pairs of users (
dhole and
pnh,
filkerdave and
whumpdotcom,
annafdd or
james_nicoll and
jonsinger) where between the members of a pair all variations are covered, but who do not overlap; these pairs, were they to friend each other, would create a larger clique.
One of the fun tools people have developed to use this data is the Clique Finder, which finds the largest group (or groups) of users who have all other members of the group listed as friends containing a particular user. At the moment, I am a member of 7 cliques of size 9, but there are interesting overlaps between the seven.
ckd,
del_c,
james_nicoll,
dhole,
filkerdave,
supergee,
annafdd,
brisingamen,
akirlu
jonsinger,
ckd,
pnh,
trinker,
supergee,
filkerdave,
eleanor,
brisingamen,
akirlu
jonsinger,
ckd,
eleanor,
trinker,
supergee,
pnh,
whumpdotcom,
brisingamen,
akirlu
jonsinger,
ckd,
matociquala,
minnehaha,
supergee,
pnh,
akirlu,
brisingamen,
whumpdotcom
jonsinger,
ckd,
matociquala,
trinker,
supergee,
pnh,
whumpdotcom,
brisingamen,
akirlu
ckd,
kip_w,
supergee,
dhole,
filkerdave,
james_nicoll,
annafdd,
brisingamen,
akirlu
filkerdave,
ckd,
kip_w,
james_nicoll,
pnh,
supergee,
annafdd,
brisingamen,
akirlu
Several of those lists make me look like a member of the
Well, that format is nice and all, but a little analysis and reformatting gets us this:
| akirlu | annafdd | brisingamen | ckd | del_c | dhole | filkerdave | james_nicoll | supergee | ||||||||
| akirlu | annafdd | brisingamen | ckd | dhole | filkerdave | james_nicoll | kip_w | supergee | ||||||||
| akirlu | annafdd | brisingamen | ckd | filkerdave | james_nicoll | kip_w | pnh | supergee | ||||||||
| akirlu | brisingamen | ckd | eleanor | filkerdave | jonsinger | pnh | supergee | trinker | ||||||||
| akirlu | brisingamen | ckd | eleanor | jonsinger | pnh | supergee | trinker | whumpdotcom | ||||||||
| akirlu | brisingamen | ckd | jonsinger | matociquala | minnehaha | pnh | supergee | whumpdotcom | ||||||||
| akirlu | brisingamen | ckd | jonsinger | matociquala | pnh | supergee | trinker | whumpdotcom |
This makes some patterns more obvious.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-13 05:20 (UTC)I'm sorry. It was just . . . there, you know? ::grin::
no subject
Date: 2005-06-13 05:26 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-13 12:09 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-13 13:27 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-13 20:02 (UTC)