Google Maps learns how to walk
The Google Maps blog notes that they now have walking directions. It's beta, like almost everything Google does these days, but still looks like a good start.
Collecting good data for this is going to be the big challenge.
(In other news, Readercon was great. I took a fair amount of panel notes, and plan to distill them into one or more posts.)
ETA: if you're walking in an area covered by Street View, it puts little camera icons next to the steps, so you can see what the cross street will look like. Wow.
Collecting good data for this is going to be the big challenge.
(In other news, Readercon was great. I took a fair amount of panel notes, and plan to distill them into one or more posts.)
ETA: if you're walking in an area covered by Street View, it puts little camera icons next to the steps, so you can see what the cross street will look like. Wow.
no subject
Tying your two topics together, I asked it for directions from the Burlington Marriott on Route 3A to Horn Pond in Woburn. Check out the result. The car and walking directions are quite different. It even knows that the parkway on the west side of Horn Pond is open for walking but closed to cars.
no subject
I'm going to see if they have walking directions from Boston, Ma to Paris, France.
I'm still sad that they took "swim across the Atlantic Ocean" out of the highway database.
no subject
no subject
That's awesome!
no subject
no subject
no subject
There's something deeply satisfying about pulling up a walking route from LGA to YUL, though. (Only 6 days, 11 hours!)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I need to try that on Googlemaps...
no subject
no subject
no subject
"Avoid highways" doesn't work: it tried to route me over a "no bicycles" segment of MN 55 once. (Aside from the first few hundred feet, there wouldn't have been a problem, because there's a bike trail along the rest of it. But that first part was the only way to cross another highway.)
no subject
no subject
Police use it, too.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Yet, it never does. Drop, that is. Most of their stuff just works. No monopoly (yet?), no proprietary, no nonsense. Is this just too good to be true?
no subject
no subject